Although the statutory law does not indicate
whether a "licensee" includes family members, the Court noted that
case law does. According to the Court, case law holds that a family
member is not a "licensee" for purposes of a RPAPL Section 713(7)
action, and that an ejectment action commenced in the Supreme Court (as opposed
to a summary eviction proceeding) is the proper avenue in such situations
involving family members (it should be noted that an ejectment action is
generally more time consuming than a summary eviction proceeding).
The Court stated the following: "These cases
seemingly show that occupancy due to familial relationship does not constitute
a licensee agreement as intended by RPAPL 713 (7). There are various
forms of family relationships ranging from spousal, parent and child, and even
nonmarried couples. They are unique and thus should not be terminated through
summary proceedings, which tend to be speedy. Instead, more appropriate
avenues must be taken such as ejectment actions or proceedings in Family
Court....All this court holds is that a family member may not be summarily
evicted from the family home with a 10-day notice to quit. A more
deliberate process is required and is readily available."
Salvatore R. Marino, Esq.
No comments:
Post a Comment